![]() But, the 10 second delay is there (which SUCKS!). It's a REALLY stable streaming platform because it buffers the images. Apple uses HTTP Live Streaming at their encapsulation protocol. If you have a camera cart with a WiFi router on it, and a cable running to the VTR guy, you'll be running around the scene streaming live HD video, and even recording it for playback. But, it's actually better for untethered guys (like you) who have some infrastructure behind them. So, someone mentioned that it's great for low-budget (5D guys) without a VTR guy. For monitoring, a few frames latency when viewed by a Director or DP isn't going to be a deal breaker.Ĭube does have some features that are really Steadicam friendly. In the context of pulling focus, you're absolutely right, Cube is unusable.Ĭube is for wireless monitoring, and for that purpose it works brilliantly. Cube is not for pulling focus! Cube is not for framing shots or operating. That means we have to crunch between 200-350Mbs down to 2Mbs, and move it to the USB bus, and send it over WiFi. ![]() ![]() ![]() After receiving the data, then we process it. Given the electronic of the camera, the processing time involved, then just transporting the video off of the camera itself would probably equate to two or three frames. The minimum theoretical possible latency if you were shooting at 24fps would be 43ms, because the CMOS has to capture the whole frame before it can begin processing. Latency is an issue anytime you begin compressing video. Guys, thanks for the feedback and expressing concerns. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |